Talk:Salvagnac

VfD discussion

No information, completely blank. No applicable linked article in the native language. Pirate-Prototype (talk) 16:31, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. This was created as part of a bulk creation by a user who was apparently only active to make those articles, and seems to lack expansion potential. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 16:34, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
• @Pirate-Prototype: Thank you. This looks to me more like a candidate for speedy deletion, along with the other dozen or so empty stubs created by user:AnglaisEP. Any alternative thoughts? --ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 16:37, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
  • @ThunderingTyphoons!: I'm in complete agreeance with that, thanks for the ping message! Pirate-Prototype (talk) 16:43, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
• user:AnglaisEP created these articles on March 17. I think we should wait one week from that date, in case they have any intention of returning to fill them in, but delete them after one week if there has been no activity. Ground Zero (talk) 16:46, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Sounds good.--ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 17:07, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

• Keep now that an IP user has added content. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:23, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
• Keep - same reason as Ikan Kekek SHB2000 (talk) 06:17, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
• Keep - I have nominated the others for deletion (below). Ground Zero (talk) 07:28, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
• Speedy keep as the reason for nomination was its emptiness. –LPfi (talk) 09:39, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
• Outcome - speedy kept... with extra speed!--ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 10:11, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Delete all content what AC has written

Continuing from Wikivoyage talk:User ban nominations, shall we remove AC's work here and only keep what the students have written? SHB2000 (talk) 10:25, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Probably yes, but let's hold fire until the discussion has concluded.--ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 10:31, 26 March 2021 (UTC)